I did some testing with wicket examples and the only thing I could find is that resources (images) are not resolved properly.
Martijn On 11/28/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I've completed the most obvious changes I could think of. Can someone please review the commit I've done? The JIRA tracker for this issue: http://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-114 Martijn On 11/28/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > who did remove it then? > Why move it to another package. Just keep it where it is, it is fine where > it is. > Just have the doc and example explain that the filter is the one to use > > johan > > > On 11/28/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > Ah, good point. So we better get it back in 2.0 too then? Maybe move > > to another package? > > > > Eelco > > > > > > On 11/27/06, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > we need to keep the servlet in some shape or form for the osgi folks. > > the > > > osgi spec doesnt support filters. so a servlet that is a think wrapper > > > around our filter should do the trick. > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > > On 11/27/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > I would be ok with removing it. Maybe Johan wants to confirm? > > > > > > > > Eelco > > > > > > > > > > > > On 11/27/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > I was giving the WicketFilter backport a shot, and I noticed that > > the > > > > > wicket servlet is completely gone from Wicket 2.x. > > > > > > > > > > Should we keep the servlet as a fallback for 1.x for existing > > > > > applications? Will that have an adverse effect on our maintenance? > > > > > > > > > > As a side note: I noticed that much of our documentation is > > > > > out-of-date regarding changed functionality in wicket-2.x. For > > > > > instance I see a lot of references to WicketServlet where Filter is > > > > > meant. Same goes for IWebApplicationFactory. I am able to fix most > > > > > obvious errors, but not all. > > > > > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > > > > > -- > > > > > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > > ">Vote</a> > > > > > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket > > > > ">Wicket</a> > > > > > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff > > in > > > > > the World!</a> > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > > -- <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in the World!</a>
-- <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket";>Wicket</a> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in the World!</a>
