+0
Juergen
On 12/2/06, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You've got your 3x+1 so I won't stand in the way.
+0
Frank
On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>
> Yeah, last vote had my +- 0, but that lead to a stale mate which is
> why this vote was restarted.
>
> Eelco
>
>
> On 12/1/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > +0 I can see both sides of the equation... I like the current api
> > because it makes explicit that the input conversion can (will) fail.
> >
> > Not sure if just declaring the checked exception in the constructor of
> > a page is just as good. ie.
> >
> > class MyPage extends WebPage {
> > MyPage(PageParameters pars) throws StringValueConversionException {
> > // ... do something with the pars.
> > }
> > }
> >
> >
> >
> > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > Can we have more votes please devs?
> > >
> > > Eelco
> > >
> > >
> > > On 12/1/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > nowadays i hate checked exceptions..
> > > >
> > > > +1
> > > >
> > > > johan
> > > >
> > > >
> > > > On 12/1/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > >
> > > > > +1
> > > > >
> > > > > Eelco
> > > > >
> > > > >
> > > > > On 11/30/06, Nick Heudecker <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > > > > > Here's the background on this vote:
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> http://www.mail-archive.com/[email protected]/msg09093.html
> > > > > >
> > > > >
>
http://www.mail-archive.com/wicket-develop%40lists.sourceforge.net/msg08690.html
> > > > > >
> > > > > > I'd like to open it up to a formal vote, even though I'm not a
> > > > > committer.
> > > > > >
> > > > > > +1 (Non-Binding)
> > > > > >
> > > > > >
> > > > >
> > > >
> > > >
> > >
> >
> >
> > --
> > <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a>
> > for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket
> ">Wicket</a>
> > at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in
> > the World!</a>
> >
>
