see the new thread. it is pretty specific. -igor
On 12/4/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 12/4/06, Sylvain Wallez <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > Martijn Dashorst wrote: > > I don't like to deprecate listview. It has enough good usecases to > > keep it and promote its use. And furthermore, I would like to know > > *which* repeaters move to core... > > > > Therefore: -1 for the proposal (either outcome) > > Is this a formal veto for the whole thing, or would you accept it if we > move some repeaters to core and don't deprecate ListView? As the proposal currently stands it is a veto. If the proposal is amended/changed, I will change my vote. The current proposal just doesn't leave much room for the middle way. In this particular case, I found the premise bad: ListView does not suck, and should remain in core. I really don't like votes where halfway through the voting subjects change. This is a horrible precedent, and clouds the meaning of earlier votes. On the other hand, starting 5 vote threads to get one thing fixed is also not helpful and just as bad. Martijn -- <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket";>Vote</a> for <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/stuff/wicket ">Wicket</a> at the <a href="http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/";>Best Stuff in the World!</a>
