sure, go ahead and swap them. the one in wicket-stuff is nowhere near usable though - it still needs a lot of work.
-igor On 12/9/06, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yeah, I think the idea was to swap them. But Igor and the others who worked on that project may be able to say more about this. Eelco On 12/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wasn't that the one that should replace the current one? > So then it is more like a swap? > > On 12/9/06, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > All > > > > I was going to move the datepicker from trunk to wicket-stuff, but > > there is already a wicket-contrib-datepicker there. What do we do with > > that project? > > > > As I already moved the 1.3 datepicker to wicket-stuff under > > wicket-contrib-datepicker in 1.2 branch, I propose to either move the > > current trunk to a new project dir at wicket-stuff, or donate it to > > Apache and develop it there. > > > > [ ] rename current trunk/wicket-contrib-datepicker to > > trunk/wicket-a-better-datepicker > > [ ] move it to apache > > [ ] ...? > > > > Martijn > > > > -- > > Vote for Wicket at the > > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > > Wicket 1.2.3 is as easy as 1-2-3. Download Wicket now! > > http://wicketframework.org > > > >
