On 12/27/06, Ingram Chen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
So the propose solution is
    <wicket:container id="foo"> not <wicket:container wicket:id="foo">
first solution save some typing but IMHO it may causes some confusion
because all components use wicket:id, not just id.

Yes, but the id is already in the Wicket namespace, so it would be
very repetitive.

Martijn

--
Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket
Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Reply via email to