btw, SecondLevelCacheSessionStore seems a little fuzzy to me as a name. it presumes someone knows what a "second level cache" is. what about something a little more direct like maybe FileBackedSessionStore? not sure i love that either, but it's maybe a little more obvious.
I don't know. It doesn't have to be stored in the file system (at least not according to the original idea) but could for instance be stored in a database system. Eelco
