The idea behind it isn't bad, but if it isn't used much and is fragile and we there are alternative ways of achieving (kind of) the same thing, I'm +1 with simplifying and thus removing.
Eelco On 1/22/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
i thought people where using this, i don't know anymore about what i didn't use it But was it for security or something? On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > +1 > > -igor > > > On 1/22/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > this api is simply too fragile. any custom requesttarget impl has to > call > > this in order for it to be consistent, and if its not consistent its > > useless. > > > > the only usecase i could come up with for this is the one we use in > > teachscape where we setup some threadlocals kept with page in this > method so > > they can be accessed by component constructors - the need for this is > > eliminated by the parent refactor. > > > > -igor > > > > > >
