Because we are still not officially landed on apache. Same argument for the user list.
Martijn On 1/24/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
if we already have the site there, then why are we still hosting it on sf.net? -igor On 1/24/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > -100 > > We already have the site up on apache: http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKETxSITE > > Martijn > > On 1/24/07, Eelco Hillenius (JIRA) <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > [ > https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235?page=com.atlassian.jira.plugin.system.issuetabpanels:comment-tabpanel#action_12467112] > > > > Eelco Hillenius commented on WICKET-235: > > ---------------------------------------- > > > > +100 > > > > > clean up info on site > > > --------------------- > > > > > > Key: WICKET-235 > > > URL: https://issues.apache.org/jira/browse/WICKET-235 > > > Project: Wicket > > > Issue Type: Bug > > > Components: site > > > Reporter: Eelco Hillenius > > > Assigned To: Martijn Dashorst > > > > > > There is some horribly outdated stuff on the site, e.g. on the FAQ: > http://wicket.sourceforge.net/faqs.html, 'How can I hide markup and/or > components?' which uses a pre 1.0 way of using wicket ids. Any such > information should be removed from the site, so that we end up just having > some plain info that won't be outdated soon. For anything we have the WIKI > and mailing list archives and examples etc. > > > > -- > > This message is automatically generated by JIRA. > > - > > You can reply to this email to add a comment to the issue online. > > > > > > > -- > Vote for Wicket at the > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org >
-- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
