* Ingo Adler:
> I'm not using Maven. I use Ant and Ivy.
Me too. And I'd love to see Wicket using the successful combo,
but this is not (yet) the case of others[1].
> I like the wicket-all idea. One version - one distribution - one
> download.
>
> First step: I create (or copy) an IntelliJ project with modules
> over the extracted distribution. So I can navigate through the
> source, the samples and the rest. The web site and the docs are
> not important. But I don't mind. If the projects are nicely
> structured I can even compile and start the sample applications
> without any hassle.
>
> I use this project to lookup how samples work, for api
> documentation and to look how the internals are implemented.
>
> Second step: I copy all the jar files I need to my repository to
> update my projects.
>
> The wicket-all distribution is a nice addition to people who
> want to get an overview over the current release quickly
> without getting into the details of the project's structures
> (subprojects and source/jar and distribution jars) in the maven
> repositories.
+1. We need to have both the artifacts deployed to a central
repository (for the Maven or Ivy users that already know Wicket),
and the all-in-one package for the beginner to become acquainted
with Wicket.
Cheers,
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
[1] http://www.nabble.com/Ant-%2B-Ivy-tf2667504.html#a7438702
