Same implementation, only no extra dependency on an external jar (concurrent.jar)
Martijn On 2/1/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
If you don't want JDK 1.4 users for the groovy integration... Otherwise, you can depend on the classes in wicket.util.concurrent (wicket 1.2 and newer). Martijn On 2/1/07, nilo.de.roock <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > In > > public class GroovyClassResolver implements IClassResolver > > , I found the following usage > > import EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent.ConcurrentHashMap; > > , and > > private final Map classCache = new ConcurrentHashMap(); > > > I don't feel too comfortable with a dependency on > EDU.oswego.cs.dl.util.concurrent. Usage of this class may date back to the > pre java.util.concurrent era. It might be possible today to replace > ConcurrentHashMap with something from Sun. > > What do you think? > - nilo > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/-Wicket-Dev--groovy-integration-ConcurrentHashMap-tf3154235.html#a8746505 > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
-- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
