If it is (at least almost) as easy to maintain then the WIKI, then
fine, so I guess we can see how well the confluence export (cause
that's still what we're going to do right? is there any work done on
documenting how that would work?) works, and if that works well, then
we can give our site some more body.

Eelco


On 2/3/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Why? It is part of our documentation. It is maintained by wicket core
devs. There is no reason for it to be at the general wiki. The purpose
of our core site is to add content to it, not keep it a 2 pager.

Martijn

Reply via email to