Yes. Someone on IRC reported seeing a leak as well. Bug can't hardly get more serious than that. Could you expand a little bit as to when that happens?
Btw, another thing we should do for 1.2.6 is set max versions to a more humble valued by default. Eelco On 2/11/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Yesterday i just fixed the AccessStackPageMap in 1.3 (that is the one used in 1.2) there is a bug in it that it leaks pages into the session under specific circumstances so maybe a 1.2.6? johan On 2/10/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Sure. So we have this release, which is great and let's leave it with > that. We can make a new 1.2.x release in a few months if there is > demand for it and if there are more bugs that have to go into it. > Meanwhile if people run into issues they can find out they were > reported and fixed and build themselves. Those two fixes are > potentially nasty, but as it doesn't seem to touch most of our user > base, I think we can focus on getting on with 1.3 and 2.0. > > Eelco > > > On 2/9/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > On 2/10/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > On 2/9/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What problems are you talking about? > > > > > > The ones Frank reported. > > > > Though for an Apache release very important and a showstopper, they > > are not for a sf.net hosted release. I'd rather spend the time > > building 1.3-beta1 than fixing these issues in 1.2.x > > > > Martijn > > -- > > Vote for Wicket at the > http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket > > Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! > > http://wicketframework.org > > >
