Btw, a link to the wicket-datetime project would be good there as well. It has a datepicker which is already much better (better API and the YUI calendar is much nicer than the jscalendar one), though at this point it missed the localization the old one has. In the future however, this would be a datepicker that would be supported by the core team (at least by me), whereas the wicket-stuff project wouldn't be officially. I think if we mention both, that'd be best.
Eelco On 2/11/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Almaw removed it because it pointed to a dead link. He's now converting the old documentation into the new wiki. The dead link is caused by the .htaccess file in the wicket-stuff.sf.net filesystem that redirects to the confluence wiki. Martijn On 2/11/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 2/11/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I am not convinced that we have to remove the reference to the > > datepicker project which is now at Wicket stuff. It is there for > > backwards compatibility. I don't know why the datepicker part of the > > wicket migration guide has been pulled. > > I don't know either. > > Eelco > -- Vote for Wicket at the http://www.thebeststuffintheworld.com/vote_for/wicket Wicket 1.2.4 is as easy as 1-2-4. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
