On 2/18/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
look this is fixed properly in 1.3 and up. we agreed no api breaks in 1.2.x. you can interpret it one way, martijn interprets it another. for him removing a method, usable or not, is an api break. whatever. who cares? 1.2.x is in maintenance mode. we should concentrate on 1.3 instead of wasting energy on discussions like this. my last 2c.
I care about it in that a user reported it, as he thought could use it but then found out he couldn't. That wasted his time, and the fix for preventing anyone else wasting his or her time over this in the future takes about 5 seconds to apply. Now because of a ridiculous argument that can only have a theoretical implication BUT NEVER a practical one *we* are wasting our time and has my mood spoiled. Eelco
