all these cons are invalid
you would also get class not found on the annotations like @SpringBean
and a log message tells you what modules have been initialized
:)
-igor
On 2/18/07, Erik van Oosten <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi Igor, Jonathan,
Good idea, I have never liked the way I had to inherit from the
application base classes.
From a users point of view, I agree with Jonathan on the config thing,
I'd rather have one line of code somewhere (on a predictable place, e.g.
application#init). This also makes it immediately clear when it does not
work: you get a classnotfoundexception. When it is implicit you can
search for hours before you realize that a jar is missing. Especially
when you are talking about annotations.
Regards,
Erik.
Jonathan Locke wrote:
> I like the idea of snap-in modules of some sort, but I don't completely
> understand what you're talking about here and I'm not sure I agree with
what
> all of what I do get.....
>
--
Erik van Oosten
http://www.day-to-day-stuff.blogspot.com/
