Oh, one thing I do not agree with is that enabled has no component argument. Even if you wouldn't use it much in practice, it should have to argument to be consistent with the other methods.
Eelco On 2/22/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
already in (1.3) need to port it to 2.0 On 2/22/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Johan Compagner wrote: > > Any objections now? (for 1.3 and 2.0) > > > > Because you can't remove a behavior from a component and now you > > also can't dynamically disabled one either. So thats a bit annoying. > > Yeah, defn. would be useful. +1 > > Al >
