Oh, ok. Sorry Matej, I didn't remember that. Is it still relevant though, as the reason to do that was that we could lift it out from Wicket in case we would work together with other frameworks, and it doesn't look like that'll happen soon?
If you have a compelling reason, we can roll it back though. Just IValidator? Eelco On 3/3/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
id say we remove iclusterable, use serializable, and add an extra line of config to terracotta: it can do something like all serializable classes in package foo right? -igor On 3/3/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hi > > As far as I remember, the idea was to have interfaces from > wicket.validation in trunk independent of the rest of wicket. But with > the last Eelco's change, replacing ISerializable with IClusterable, it's > no longer independent. What do we do about that? > > -Matej >
