Ok it seems that they use a staight BSD license[1] as one of there dual license licenses. So we should be ok, if we state in our NOTICE that we use it under the BSD license.
Frank [1]: http://manual.dojotoolkit.org/WikiHome/DojoDotBook/Book15 On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/branches/wicket-1.x/wicket-examples/src/main/java/wicket/examples/preview/dojo.js?view=log On 3/4/07, Jean-Baptiste Quenot <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > * [EMAIL PROTECTED]: > > Author: frankbille > > Date: Sun Mar 4 07:27:59 2007 > > New Revision: 514405 > > > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=514405 > > Log: > > Added missing license headers. > > Added attributions to the NOTICE. > > I'm not sure about DOJO and JettyHelper classes. Are they under an ASL > compatible license? > > Yes, both are under the ASL. But why do you ask for Dojo, do we > include it in Wicket? > -- > Jean-Baptiste Quenot > aka John Banana Qwerty > http://caraldi.com/jbq/ >
