Yeah sorry. Perhaps I should have explained my thoughts. But yes, will we put license headers in generated files such as javadoc and maven site?
IMO if there is some easy plugin for maven or assembly that can do it, then perhaps we should. But I don't want to spend a lot of time on it. Let me see if I can find something that *integrates" with maven so it wont be any extra steps for the release manager. :) Frank On 3/4/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
You mean that we should include the ASL in generated stuff, such as our JavaDoc? Do you have other parts in mind? Martijn On 3/4/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > On 3/4/07, Jean T. Anderson <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > Regarding not including the ASF header in generated output, although it > > isn't required it's still a good idea to include it where feasible so > > end users aren't confused about usage [1]. > > > > In my opinion it isn't a show stopper for this release, but if I were > > you, I'd go ahead and include the header when in doubt and if it's > > reasonable to do so. > > > > Incidently, the src-headers page [2] mentions a handy tool in the > > committers repo [3] that will actually slap those headers on for you in > > a comment for various file types. > > > > ... > > > > > > > [1] > > http://mail-archives.apache.org/mod_mbox/www-legal-discuss/200611.mbox/[EMAIL PROTECTED] > > > > > > Hmm.... > > WDYT? > -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
