well i guess someone will have to write up a patch and make sure it works in
all the browsers :)

-igor


On 3/7/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

I seriously doubt it will work in browsers. Not choking on wicket:
tags and attributes is one thing, having them available in the dom and
working is a completely other beast.

Martijn

On 3/7/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> now here is an idea we can try. something like wicket:placeholder.
>
> -igor
>
>
> On 3/7/07, Frédéric Bertin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> > well, from a user point of view, the fact that you can't make a
> > component visible using Ajax by simply doing:
> >
> > component.setVisible(true)
> > target.addComponent(component)
> >
> > is perceived as a bug. And I can't believe you guys won't find
something
> > smarter for Wicket than using a surrounding container ;)
> >
> > For example, instead of using an HTML tag, what about using a Wicket
> > specific one, like <wicket:component id="myInvisibleComponent"/> ?
> >
> > Fred
> >
> >
> >
> >
> > Martijn Dashorst wrote:
> > > I don't agree. style="display:none" is not the same as not rendering
> > > it at all
> > >
> > > The text and markup is still available, it could have stuff that is
> > > sensitive in it. setVisible (false) should always remove the whole
> > > markup for the component from the stream.
> > >
> > > Ajax should work the same as normal requests. Otherwise what is the
> > > fricking point of having a AjaxFallbackLink?
> > >
> > > Yes it is a drag to add containers around your stuff that you want
to
> > > hide. but it makes it explicit and predictable.
> > >
> > > Martijn
> > >
> > > On 3/7/07, Vincent Demay <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> > >> I think it will be easier to speek about this in the mailing list
;) .
> > >>
> > >> I agree with the last comment : "then why not simply adding the
> > >> style="display:none" attribute to the component tag, instead of
> > creating
> > >> an additional <span> ?" but without its innnerHtml, only the
> > >> componentTag. I think it should work in all case.
> > >>
> > >> --
> > >> Vincent Demay
> > >> http://wwww.demay-fr.net/blog/
> > >>
> > >
> >
> >
>


--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org

Reply via email to