* Johan Compagner:
> first not to screw the people that do use 2.0 twice that we drop
> it and that they have to backport it with nothing not only the
> constructor change but also the rest (and when they have done
> that going to 1.3 and we release 1.4 they have to undo there
> undo's again!)
No, the goal is to let them move from 2.0 to 1.4 directly.
> secondly if we release that fast as it is now proposed then we
> go instead of having 2 active branches (1.3 and 2.0) and one
> maintenance (1.2) to 1 active branche (1.5) and 2 to maintain
> (1.3 and 1.4)
No, 1.4 will occur when 1.3 is frozen of course. And we'll be
inciting users to upgrade.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
