when i do mvn install from that branch root i get: http://papernapkin.org/pastebin/view/4946
-igor On 3/8/07, Alastair Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Martijn Dashorst wrote: > On 3/8/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: >> We can automate the scp stuff as part of the -DperformRelease=true. >> >> We should surely also be copying doing a proper deploy, not an install, >> so that we copy the JARs for the projects to apache's Maven repo, so >> they can be synced up with repo1.maven.org? > > Incubator jars are barred from being released to the central repo. And > the release should be voted on before we put it into the wild. Maven > does have something like a staging thing, not sure how that works. Hmmm. We still need the Maven 2 poms and things in a repo somewhere so people can actually use them. If we're not allowed to publish things to repo1.maven.org while incubating that's pretty serious and seems rather misguided. :-( >> I'm still in favour of using the release plug-in if we can, as it scps >> the site to the right place, doesn't let you tag if there are test >> failures, and all the rest of it. > > We will not deploy the site as it currently is: no more examples and > just the default maven reports. But having the javadoc and the > dependencies up on the site is something worthwile. The WICKETxSITE > will function as our site portal, wicket-1.3.0 will have the release > details. Well, I was going to tweak the output of site:site somewhat to make it more useful as part of this process. >> > We also need to sign the release using gpg, as I understand there is a >> > maven plugin for that as well. >> >> OK, I'll see if I can look into this at some point. > > I just got gpg installed on my mac, so I'll be able to generate a key > and sign the releases. Hokay. What I'm interested in at this point is whether people would be happy to move the 1.3 modules/build structure to something that resembles this branch. I'm reluctant to do much more work on this proof-of-concept branch as there seems little point doing it all twice. I'll call a vote on this shortly on dev@ if no one objects. I'd also like to rename the "wicket-1.x" branch to "wicket-1.3.x" while I'm about it. Al
