Yeah, I'd like like to have it available somewhere, preferably in the maven repository. Can't we name the version such that it is clear that it is an unofficial version or something?
Eelco On 3/10/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Agreed. However I think we should publish the release to the @dev crowd. So we will get some traction for our 1.3 effort. However, before we can go public with the release it should pass the ipmc, so whatever happens, it won't happen before the end of the week ;-) Martijn On 3/10/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > this is of course only for the "public" release. we should continue forward > with the ipmc release to check our legal stuff. > > -igor > > > On 3/10/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > i think we should hold off on this vote because now there is a possibility > > of all 2.0 backports making it into this branch after this release. > > > > so for now i am changing my vote to -1 until we have decided on the > > roadmap for the 1.3 branch. > > > > -igor > > > > > > On 3/7/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > this vote is to release 1.3beta > > > > > > -igor > > > > > > > > -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
