I see a lot of answers coming: read the javadoc :) Martijn
On 3/14/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
oi. i see a lot of questions coming in why models arent being detached :) -igor On 3/14/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I'd only opt for one level deep. i.e. direct fields. At least that is > what we do currently. > > Martijn > > On 3/14/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > but thats slow..you have to traverse the entire object graph of the page > no? > > and the class graph. yikes. > > > > we should use aspectj load time weaver to instrument Component classes > to do > > this! :) now there is a case of "aop" i can go for. > > > > -igor > > > > > > On 3/14/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > In our project we have things that use IModel fields. I have created a > > > utility class that uses reflection to find all IDetachable fields in > > > an object and calls detach() on them. Is this something for > > > wicket.util? > > > > > > Martijn > > > > > > -- > > > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com > > > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket > > > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! > > > http://wicketframework.org > > > > > > > > -- > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket > Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! > http://wicketframework.org >
-- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
