+1 (binding) -Matej
On 3/15/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
I totally agree. I have also started a release wiki page where I try to collect the information about the legals we have been going through and solved. http://cwiki.apache.org/confluence/display/WICKET/Wicket+1.3.0+incubating+checkpoint+1 Frank On 3/15/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > we are doing that, but its not a public release > > -igor > > > On 3/14/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > +1 and I still think we should do a 1.3 release to IPMC "now" > > > > Frank > > > > > > On 3/15/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > There's been a lot of comment and discussion lately about the future > > > direction of Wicket, and the trunk/2.0 branch in particular. > > > > > > We've done some hard thinking and we now have a roadmap for the > future. > > > > > > When What > > > ==== ==== > > > Now Backport the Model refactor and other remaining > non-JDK-5 > > > features from 2.0 to the 1.3.x branch. > > > Soon Release a 1.3.0-beta to the community. > > > Soon Release a 1.3.0-rc1. [2, 3, etc. if required] > > > > > > A bit later Release a 1.3.0 final. > > > Fork a 1.4.x branch from the 1.3.0 release. > > > Apply generics and other JDK-5 features to 1.4.xbranch. > > > This will make 1.4.x look just like 2.0, but with the > > same > > > constructor/add logic as 1.2.x/1.3.x currently have. > > > > > > "now" ~= right now. > > > "soon" ~= within a couple of weeks. > > > "A bit later" ~= within a month or so. > > > > > > We will discontinue support for 2.0 once we have branched 1.4.x and > > > added generics support into it, at which point the 2.0 branch will be > > > renamed in subversion and left to stagnate. > > > > > > As already thrashed out in various discussions, this will achieve the > > > following: > > > > > > - Provide a migration path for 2.0 users within a month or so, so > they > > > are not left high and dry. 1.4.x will be basically the same as 2.0 > > > currently is, only with the constructor change backed out. > > > > > > - Give us two branches that will be very similar apart from JDK 5 > > > features, and thus make it easy to back-port fixes/features from > > > the 1.4 branch to the 1.3 branch. > > > > > > - Give us a 1.3.0 beta that is feature-complete, and thus make > > > upgrading from beta >> RC >> final releases trivial. > > > > > > Best regards, > > > > > > Al > > > > > >
