I don't think it is. Limitation of how generics work I'm afraid.
Eelco On 3/20/07, Patrick Angeles <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Johan Compagner wrote: > > no i am not pro for degenerifying it. > I like the getModelObject() > > and that we have to do this: > TextField<Integer> integerTextField = new > TextField<Integer>(this,"integerProperty", Integer.class); > I haven't looked at Wicket 2.0 source, so I may be off here, but it's possible to skip the last parameter of the TextField constructor so it looks like this: TextField<Integer> integerTextField = new TextField<Integer>(this,"integerProperty") ; -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/generics-in-Wicket-tf3360271.html#a9580850 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
