* Eelco Hillenius:
> There's a couple of things I'm not crazy about.
>
> First of all, I'd much prefer just having factory method for
> exceptions, so that clients can choose themselves what are
> interesting exceptions and how to deal with that. That's way
> more flexible, as new cases wouldn't need new methods, and it
> would keep the interface minimal.
+1
> Another thing is that this would mean more ways to do the same
> thing. We already have RequestCycle#onRuntimeException, which
> IMO is a decent facility. I'd actually prefer it to be a bit
> more flexible to just return a request target or something, so
> that you can send an error code or redirect to a bookmarkable
> page (for the sake of ending up with a better url).
+1
Let's not start having one method for every type of exception.
Let the power to the users.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
