On 3/26/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
we have reached a consensus in the discussion thread and it went quiet so i
assumed no one else had anything to say.
like i said the controversy was over the fact that it would do too much
magic/be automatic and that is why i closed the original jira issue as wont
fix. right now it is completely manual so i committed it because if you dont
use it explicitly it doesnt affect you. the basic idea behind it is the
same, but the way it is implemented is completely different so we wouldnt
even be voting on what we have started out discussing.
shall we have a vote still you think?
It would have suited the discussion to get a summary of the proposal,
and see if no-one objects. Because after 64 messages in a thread, it
gets hard to see what actually has been proposed.
Though I'm 0 on the subject.
Martijn
--
Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now!
http://wicketframework.org
