On 3/30/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
well, however you fix it, imho the way it is now is broken.

No that's reversing it. It was truly broken, as it wasn't called at
all (in fact I committed the check on isEnabled just a couple of days
ago). Your concern is that it still not may work at all times (if
people forget to call super) which is quite a different thing.

I'm also hoping that whoever wrote the original method chimes in here.

Eelco

Reply via email to