All that kind of stuff has real data thats on the servere side.
for example a list (paging) that you sort? what do you sort? what is now on
screen?
But 95% of the data isn't in the browser instance it sits on the server (or
database)

a simple hopping card is maybe possible without any server calls but what
would that really gain
from a user perspective?

the problem is that in wicket you can do everything in the code, you have
access to everything
so when you have a java->javascript compiler for pieces of code. Then those
pieces should be really standalone.
If you want such a thing use GWT.

johan


On 4/4/07, Korbinian Bachl <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

possible ideas:

- a shoppingcart that works 100% in the browser if possible, else degrades
gracefully to the well known server side

- sorting logic of lists in backendapplications (e.g: sort by name
beginning
with "B*" ... so fancy excel stuff etc.)

i like the idea, however i have no clue if it could be done...

> -----Ursprüngliche Nachricht-----
> Von: Johan Compagner [mailto:[EMAIL PROTECTED]
> Gesendet: Mittwoch, 4. April 2007 16:42
> An: [email protected]
> Betreff: Re: Wicket + java->javascript compiler?
>
> again i ask.
> give me an example
> the only thing i can think of is having client side
> validatiors (so our validators also have a client part
> besides the server part)
>
> What else is there that would benefit from this without a
> server call being made.
>
> johan
>
>
> On 4/4/07, Neeme Praks <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> >
> >
> > Matej Knopp wrote:
> > > But wicket is a framework that manages server side state.
> >
> > That is quite a strong statement and I do not see it backed up by
> > "official" Wicket "marketing story".
> > http://incubator.apache.org/wicket/introduction.html
> >
> > Wicket is all about writing modular web applications in
> java, with all
> > the benefits that come with the strongly-typed language. The word
> > "server" is rarely mentioned in the documentation and "server side
> > state" is an implementation detail.
> >
> > If we can write modular web applications in java and
> publish parts of
> > them as JavaScript to be run in the client, thus reducing
> the amount
> > of server state - I think this is still Wicket.
> >
> > Rgds,
> > Neeme
> >
> >
>


Reply via email to