Re: i don't know if i like the name INestedModelContainer

[Sven Meier]

I throw another one into the ring:
   IDerivedModel ??

Igor Vaynberg wrote:

the idea was to standardize our jargon. we use "nested" and "wrap" all over

the place, it is better to be consistent and only use one or the other.

tbh i dont like nested either, but i couldnt come up with anything better
myself. the closest i came is "delegate"

so you would have

IWrapModel->IDelegatingModel { IModel getDelegete(); }
createAssignmentDelegate, createInheritanceDelegate, etc

i dont know if i like that more or less

-igor


On 4/5/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:

Yeah, I'm not very fond of that name either. But I can't think of
anything better so far. Btw. we have AbstractWrapModel implements
INestedModelContainer, which is not very consistent.

-Matej

On 4/5/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Because that looks a lot like our XXXXContainers which are components
> and INestedModelContainer is not a component but still a model.
>
> And IWrapModel was not only telling me that it wraps the model no it
> also told me that it did wrap the component that was given by
> public INestedModelContainer wrapOnInheritance(Component component)
>
> so you wrap the component in a model that again also wrapps the outer
> model..
>
> johan
>