* Jonathan Locke:
> Sounds good. And of course there's that earlier thread about
> making it really easy to make a dynamic page render static
> snapshots on an interval. That would also be particularly
> interesting for certain applications.
Indeed caching is the next step, and it is something badly needed
in Wicket. I remember some weeks ago the developers arguing that
we don't need ehcache, that makes sense if you only consider
storing pages, but Wicket's page store is definitely not a
general-purpose store.
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
