Of course, I haven't optimized/compressed animate.js, which Yahoo has done for its scripts.
Martijn On 4/16/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 4/16/07, Matej Knopp <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > But the size difference makes animator > better pick i think. When I compare the sizes of whats loaded on the two pages it's: Animate.js: 80kb Yahoo: 70kb Where the javascript part is Animate.js: 23kb Yahoo: 9kb + 4kb So when Yahoo page looks much better/smoother here, I would say go for yahoo :) Frank
-- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.5 will keep your server alive. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
