As I see it, it could be implemented MarkupContainer, looking for an
interface IAlternateParentProvider when add() is called, and add it to the
parent returned by getAlternateParent(). I don't know if the alternateParent
logic should also apply for replace & remove.

Jan.


igor.vaynberg wrote:
> 
> i am planning on backporting ialternateparentprovider still. of course if
> you want to beat me to it with a patch you are most welcome.
> 
> -igor
> 
> 
> On 4/25/07, Jan Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>>
>>
>> I am now porting our code, and already came across a number of issues:
>> * no longer support for alternate parents
>> * MarkupContainer.add() (where we could implement our own alternate
>> parent
>> logic) is final
>> * Component.getModel() is now final
>>
>> When I get all code ported & debugged, I will point out the issues I
>> encountered, and make any suggestions where appropriate.
>>
>> Jan.
>>
>>
>> Johan Compagner wrote:
>> >
>> > and if you do your port now from 2.0 to 1.3
>> > then you could maybe point us to a feature that was in 2.0 but is
>> > overlooked
>> > by use to backport
>> >
>> > johan
>> >
>> >
>> > On 4/24/07, Jan Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> OK, thanks a lot.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> >> >
>> >> > You can track the backports on the wiki:
>> >> >
>> >> > http://cwiki.apache.org/WICKET/backporting-features-from-trunk.html
>> >> >
>> >> > Trunk is the main development. As long as we don't put 1.3 in
>> >> > maintenance mode (which will occur somewhere around 1.3.0 and
>> 1.3.1),
>> >> > it will be 1.3. 1.3 will then be moved to branches/wicket-1.3 (and
>> bug
>> >> > fixes will go there), and future development continues on trunk
>> >> > (wicket x.y, which is the version you want).
>> >> >
>> >> > Martijn
>> >> >
>> >> > On 4/24/07, Jan Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Kan ook moeilijk anders, met die naam...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> But serious now: seen that the first alpha with JDK1.5 is scheduled
>> >> for
>> >> >> 'somewhere after half june' (that might easily be somewhere after
>> the
>> >> >> summer), we want to leave the 'dead' 2.0 branch before that. One
>> >> option
>> >> >> is
>> >> >> join the 1.3 release branch, another is join the new trunk (that
>> might
>> >> >> become the new x.y version).
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Question is: have there been any changes (other than the generics
>> and
>> >> the
>> >> >> constructor change) from the old 2.0 branch that have been
>> backported
>> >> to
>> >> >> the
>> >> >> new trunk ? Or is this trunk just what will become 1.3.1 ? In the
>> last
>> >> >> case,
>> >> >> are there any plans to backport more changes from 2.0 ? Or aren't
>> >> there
>> >> >> just
>> >> >> not any ? I'm referring to refactorings in converters, models, ajax
>> &
>> >> >> versioning, ...
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Jan.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >> Martijn Dashorst wrote:
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > On 4/24/07, Jan Vermeulen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
>> >> >> >> Thanks.  I had been looking on the developer forum.
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Fortunately I could redirect you to the flickr page, saving some
>> >> >> bandwidth
>> >> >> > ;)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > (Yes I'm dutch, and therefore cheap!)
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > Martijn
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> > --
>> >> >> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
>> >> >> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
>> >> >> > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
>> >> >> > http://wicketframework.org
>> >> >> >
>> >> >> >
>> >> >>
>> >> >> --
>> >> >> View this message in context:
>> >> >>
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Timeframe-to-move-wicket---wicket-ext-projects-to-JDK1.5-tf3638110.html#a10162126
>> >> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >> >>
>> >> >>
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >> > --
>> >> > Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com
>> >> > Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket
>> >> > Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now!
>> >> > http://wicketframework.org
>> >> >
>> >> >
>> >>
>> >> --
>> >> View this message in context:
>> >>
>> http://www.nabble.com/Timeframe-to-move-wicket---wicket-ext-projects-to-JDK1.5-tf3638110.html#a10164517
>> >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>> >>
>> >>
>> >
>> >
>>
>> --
>> View this message in context:
>> http://www.nabble.com/Timeframe-to-move-wicket---wicket-ext-projects-to-JDK1.5-tf3638110.html#a10181841
>> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
>>
>>
> 
> 

-- 
View this message in context: 
http://www.nabble.com/Timeframe-to-move-wicket---wicket-ext-projects-to-JDK1.5-tf3638110.html#a10183365
Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.

Reply via email to