as of yesterday it is -igor
On 5/4/07, Ivo van Dongen <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
On 5/4/07, James McLaughlin <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > fwiw, i've occasionally wanted an onRemove callback in the component (and > now behavior :) ) Did I mis something? Is it possible to remove behaviors now? That would be great, this was something I ran into last week with a timer behavior. Regard, Ivo hierarchy so the object can undo some of its "damage" when > replaced. If we had this, then we could leave that issue to the > developer's > discretion. I've had to use the two phase init pattern occassionally, so > this would be minorly helpful, and does avoid the two phase construction > proposal that would make wicket a managed framework. Maybe it can be > called > onFirstAttach, which seems to jibe better with the wicket model of > providing > callbacks into the lifecycle rather than forcing it top down. > > best, > jim > > On 5/4/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > so is it a firstattach if you remove a component and then readd it at a > > later time? > > > > -igor > > > > > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > > > > > > Although I do still think we should generally discourage two-phase > > > construction, it is occasionally truly necessary and it seems like it > > > might > > > be nice to have a method up in Component that uses those component > bits > > to > > > return whether the component has been attached already. This way, when > > two > > > phase truly is needed, you don't need to implement a boolean for use > in > > > your > > > onAttach(). Instead you would call isFirstAttach() which would check a > > > single lighter-weight bit (versus 16 or even 32 bits per component in > a > > > subclass (depending on processor architecture and alignment > > considerations > > > of the JVM)). I'm not neccessarily /gung-ho/ about this idea, but the > > > core > > > is in a unique position to add this to the root Component class and I > > > personally would use it if it existed in those unusual cases where I > > need > > > to > > > do two-phase construction. I think other developers might like it as > > well. > > > Thoughts? > > > > > > -- > > > View this message in context: > > > > > > http://www.nabble.com/isFirstAttach%28%29-convenience-method-tf3692483.html#a10324166 > > > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > > > > > > > > > -- Ivo van Dongen Func. Internet Integration W http://www.func.nl T +31 20 4230000 F +31 20 4223500
