+1 This is something I add to figure out how to do myself with a WebMarkupContainer, would have been easier with what you're proposing.
Xavier On 5/5/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
+1 Eelco On 5/5/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > so i propose a vote to add this. i'm +1. > > > Eelco Hillenius wrote: > > > > Yeah. I actually think I proposed something like this, or at least > > +1-ed one at more than a year ago. You'll have to dig in the archives > > to find out why other people didn't agree back then, but I still think > > it's much easier for users to discover something just because it has > > an obvious name, and not to worry about that one extra class. > > > > Eelco > > > > > > On 5/4/07, Jonathan Locke <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > >> > >> In my work project, I've added and frequently use an EmptyPanel which is > >> simply a panel with empty markup. Although you can do the same thing > >> with > >> WebMarkupContainer or implement this yourself, it does seem like a nice > >> conceptual addition, particularly for newbies who might not think "hmm... > >> i > >> want an empty panel instead of this fancy panel if the user isn't logged > >> in... oh WebMarkupContainer looks about right..." ;-) Anyway, I thought > >> I'd > >> mention it in case others feel this would be a nice addition to core. > >> -- > >> View this message in context: > >> http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10324363 > >> Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >> > >> > > > > > > -- > View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/EmptyPanel--tf3692546.html#a10333463 > Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com. > >
-- Learn Ivy at ApacheCon: http://www.eu.apachecon.com/ Manage your dependencies with Ivy! http://incubator.apache.org/ivy/
