On 5/6/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Well, then someone would complain wouldn't they? You know what, I'm sick of this and deleted the projects, including the wicket-stuff-examples, which was another one of these projects only maintained by me.
Instead of all people reacting furiously, why not take a step back and see why we actually have these projects? The contrib-data projects seemed dead to me. Consider me mistaken in that regard. In my defense: - the projects didn't have a release since 2005 - there are no wiki pages for the projects - there is an actively maintained external project with similar scope I don't want them removed as you state you are maintaining them, but I would like there to be some form of documentation or other form of information as to the purpose and intent of these projects. Having a downloadable release on sf.net that is obsolete (wicket 1.0? based) seems worse than not having them available and the projects only accessible from svn as that seems to be the intent of the projects. As hibernate is lgpl, this project would never (read: until legal@ decides otherwise) be acceptable in core. Martijn -- Learn Wicket at ApacheCon Europe: http://apachecon.com Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
