i do not use the project. i do not have time, nor honestly the desire, to fix every wicketstuff project i do not use. do you find that unfair? as for it being fixed on a version, do you think anyone would bump down their hibernate version just for an auxilary project? i think not. maybe no one reported it because no one is using it, i dont know.
-igor On 5/6/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> what defines a project as alive? at the least it works, not just compiles. > take data-hibernate 3. it compiles, but doesnt work because it hasnt been > synced with hibernate 3 changes. It is fixed on a version in the POM, and to my knowledge it works with that version! > if someone was to pick it up, fix it so it > works, etc, then it can be moved into trunk again. If you think there is a problem with it, why didn't you just report it? If the problem you describe exists, it's a 5 minute fix. That would have been a possitive contribution. Eelco
