Johan Compagner wrote: > > Normally if you want to repaint a repeater then you have to repaint a > parent > of the repeater >
You didn't have to in the former 2.0. And I don't see any good reason why you would not be allowed to rerender a component that has no markup. We used it (with the former 2.0) f.i. to rerender just one single cell in a table. Having to rerender the parent of the repeater means rerender the whole table. Is there a reason why this possibility has been lost ? Jan. -- View this message in context: http://www.nabble.com/Backporting-from-2.0%3A-renderComponent%28%29-fails-if-there-is-no-markup-tf3703472.html#a10358165 Sent from the Wicket - Dev mailing list archive at Nabble.com.
