sorry, I forgot to uncomment it. Interesting that no junit test failed -> we definitely should add one to avoid such fauxpage in the future.
The change is part of a (small) step by step change towards markup fragments. Juergen On 5/10/07, Igor Vaynberg <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
juergen, did you forget to uncomment it or was there a bigger plan at work? -igor On 5/9/07, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Author: ivaynberg > Date: Wed May 9 20:02:53 2007 > New Revision: 536736 > > URL: http://svn.apache.org/viewvc?view=rev&rev=536736 > Log: > dont know why initialize() was commented out, but it left componentmap > uninitialized, which led to component lookup failures. > > Modified: > incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4 > /wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/MergedMarkup.java > > Modified: incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4 > /wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/MergedMarkup.java > URL: > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/MergedMarkup.java?view=diff&rev=536736&r1=536735&r2=536736 > > ============================================================================== > --- incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/MergedMarkup.java > (original) > +++ incubator/wicket/trunk/jdk-1.4/wicket/src/main/java/org/apache/wicket/markup/MergedMarkup.java > Wed May 9 20:02:53 2007 > @@ -81,7 +81,7 @@ > merge(markup, baseMarkup, extendIndex); > > // Initialize internals based on new markup > -// initialize(); > + initialize(); > > if (log.isDebugEnabled()) > { > > >
