* Xavier Hanin:
> Interesting idea. Using WicketTester for production seems a
> little bit strange, but why not if it makes it easy to do what I
> want. I will investigate more to see if it fits my need.
The only strange thing about using WicketTester in production is
its name, but if you are outside of an HTTP request you need to
mock the environment in one way or another, because in the end
Wicket is "only" meant to serve HTTP requests in a sophisticated
way, it is not a general purpose template engine.
Cheers,
--
Jean-Baptiste Quenot
aka John Banana Qwerty
http://caraldi.com/jbq/
