yes move the code thats now in internalInit to get the configuration type to application/webapplication.
Was the proposal that we need to implement it always? and then do all the things themselfs what we do now? thats horrible johan On 5/31/07, Eelco Hillenius <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
> Proposal: > ========= > I think we should have a pull model for this. In other words, we should > make Application#getConfigurationType() abstract and call that to get > the type. We then let people handle this however they want. I'm fine with that method, but why make it abstract? I think it's better to provide an implementation, which by default looks for the filter parameter and possibly - as an override - the system property. If people want to pin the type down, they can override the method and return what they like. Eelco
