Yeah, that sounds right. Eelco
On 6/5/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hi folks, I'm pretty sure our slf4j dependencies are very wrong. I see the root pom.xml in trunk has a dependencies section that doesn't actually include slf4j-api (it's only in the dependenciesManagement). Instead, it includes slf4j-log4j12 and log4j, which surely isn't right? Isn't the whole point of using slf4j so that we don't mandate a logging framework choice? If we're going to force log4j bindings we may as well use log4j everywhere. I think we should be depending on sfl4j-api for the core projects and that's it. The examples project or test scopes may well want bindings for log4j. Regards, Al -- Alastair Maw Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com
