Given the concern raised by Noel and some other things I noticed, I'm going to retract this distribution and start a new vote in a couple of hours.
Martijn On 6/10/07, Martijn Dashorst <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Nah, It is in the distribution to prevent the nice event of dependency hunting, and we always shipped log4j in our 1.2.x zips (including commons-logging and the servlet api) Martijn On 6/10/07, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > wicket core shipping log4j? thats wrong anyway. > > only examples could include it. > > johan > > > On 6/10/07, Noel J. Bergman <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > > > What's the deal with > > > > http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/incubator/wicket/tags/wicket-1.3.0-incubating-b > > eta-2/licenses/log4j-license.txt?revision=545721&view=markup ? > > > > Log4J is an ASF project, and we have not permitted new code to go out with > > the old license for years. I checked pom.xml, and wicket uses Log4J > > 1.2.13. > > According to http://svn.apache.org/viewvc/logging/log4j/tags/v1_2_13/, > > that > > is under the current Apache License, not the old one. > > > > --- Noel > > > > > > > -- Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
-- Join the wicket community at irc.freenode.net: ##wicket Wicket 1.2.6 contains a very important fix. Download Wicket now! http://wicketframework.org
