Ceki Gulcu wrote:
You might want to consider jcl104-over-slf4j as a JCL replacement. The
jcl104-over-slf4j modules is compatible with the JCL API but uses
SLF4J underneath.
Wow, we get a visit from the man himself. Hi Ceki. ;-)
We don't want to force this dependency on the users. If they want to
replace commons-logging with jcl104-over-slf4j stuff, they're quite free
to, but we really shouldn't be pushing that at people (even if it is
"better").
I'm going to write a wiki page detailing the options. We should probably
put it near the getting started stuff, as otherwise people will wonder
why they have no logging. :-)
Regards,
Al
--
Alastair Maw
Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com
