i agree more with Frank, i don't like that Button would be come SubmitButton
For me Button doesn't say what it does. no it tells me how it looks And many buttons don't submit but they are link (onclick) So having a SubmitButton is mostly not true for me because it doesn't so a submit! its a <button type="button" onclick=""> johan On 6/18/07, Frank Bille <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
Hey We could also rename AjaxSubmitButton into AjaxButton. Then we have: Button, ImageButton and AjaxButton (and AjaxFallbackButton) and SubmitLink and AjaxSubmitLink I don't know whats best, yet. It's just a surgestion now that we play with names :) Frank On 6/18/07, Al Maw <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > Hello, > > I know we're in a feature freeze, and I'm aware this one is likely to be > somewhat controversial, but I think we should rename a couple of the > submit components, leaving behind @deprecated classes which extend the > renamed ones. > > We currently have: > > Button, ImageButton, SubmitLink, AjaxSubmitButton, AjaxSubmitLink. > > We're about to have an AjaxFallbackSubmitButton, too. [1] > > It would make sense for me for everything to be based on the word > "Submit", so I think we should rename: > > Button -> SubmitButton (highly controversial, obviously) > ImageButton -> SubmitImage > > This may well need to wait 'til 1.4.x. > > WDYT? > > > Al > > -- > Alastair Maw > Wicket-biased blog at http://herebebeasties.com > > [1] WICKET-634 > [Ajax[Fallback]]Submit[Image|Button|Link] > If we support all combinations (which we probably should) that's > nine(!) components. I wish Java supported mix-ins. :-( >
