I second this motion. I had thought about suggesting this a few weeks ago.
I reckon that 99.99% of apps will subclass these two classes and provide their own typesafe getters. Cameron. > -----Original Message----- > From: [EMAIL PROTECTED] [mailto:wicket-develop- > [EMAIL PROTECTED] On Behalf Of Igor Vaynberg > Sent: Wednesday, 17 August 2005 3:25 PM > To: [email protected] > Subject: [Wicket-develop] Renaming getApplication() and getSession() > > What do you guys think of renaming all the getApplication() and > getSession() > methods to getWicketApplication() and getWicketSession(). I am really sick > of introducing get<SHORT_APP_NAME>Application() and > get<SHORT_APP_NAME>Session() everywhere because afore mentioned are > already > taken and final! Makes my code look way more verbose. Seems like a good > time > to do it since we are breaking some things in this release anyways. > > -Igor > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO > September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle > Practices > Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA > Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf > _______________________________________________ > Wicket-develop mailing list > [email protected] > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop ------------------------------------------------------- SF.Net email is Sponsored by the Better Software Conference & EXPO September 19-22, 2005 * San Francisco, CA * Development Lifecycle Practices Agile & Plan-Driven Development * Managing Projects & Teams * Testing & QA Security * Process Improvement & Measurement * http://www.sqe.com/bsce5sf _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
