All, Sourceforge is implementing the subversion stuff. A lot of complaints have arisen on the wicket lists and irc about the availability of anonymous CVS. Many want us to move to another hosting party. I'm convinced that sourceforge will improve their service, and they have assured me as such that it is on their short term radar.
As for subversion/cvs there are apparently pro's and cons. According to sourceforge SVN is slower than CVS, so that might be a downside. I have no data to confirm this claim. SVN is newer and generally a better SCM system than CVS. Tool support is not as great at the moment though. I believe that Netbeans still has to build in SVN support, and subclipse is external to the eclipse project, so it will be behind in features and ease of use when compared to the CVS support. I will perform a test import of our CVS repository to see how this works out. Later on, when we decided whether or not to move to SVN, I will take a moment and perform the import once again but with more recent data. So my question is: should we move to SVN? Martijn -- Living a wicket life... Martijn Dashorst - http://www.jroller.com/page/dashorst Wicket 1.1.1 is out: http://wicket.sourceforge.net/wicket-1.1 ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
