Sounds good to me, thanks Eelco.

Eelco Hillenius wrote:
Yep. Doesn't have to be 0, but he have to agree on it being the
minimum for a decent release.

Eelco

On 3/1/06, Riyad Kalla <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote:
  
I'm curious how you guys are tracking the 1.2 TODO items to know when we
are getting closer to a 1.2 release. I'm not trying to push, just
curious; I personally love the fact that you hold back releases to close
out all known issues.

Are we basically just waiting for this to reach 0?
http://sourceforge.net/tracker/?atid=684975&group_id=119783&func=browse

I'd vote for that as long as you guys thought these were all dooable.

Best,
Riyad


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

    


-------------------------------------------------------
This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language
that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast
and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory!
http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=k&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642
_______________________________________________
Wicket-develop mailing list
[email protected]
https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop

  

Reply via email to