Not sure I want the additional methods. Jon opened an RFE on rethinking the current lifecycle management. May be we should have that discussion first.
Juergen On 3/9/06, Johan Compagner <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > that would be a better name yes. > Don't know if we can break that in 1.2.. > > We could depricate it and point to onBeginRender() > > Do we also need to have a onBeginRequest (or onBeginEventDispatch())? > > johan > > > > On 3/9/06, [EMAIL PROTECTED] <[EMAIL PROTECTED]> wrote: > > I once again stumbled over the misnaming of Component#onBeginRequest(). > > > > As already discussed it would better be named onBeginRender(): > > > > > > http://sourceforge.net/mailarchive/message.php?msg_id=13357646 > > > > Was the decision to rename these methods voted down or just forgotten? > > > > Sven > > > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- > > This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting > language > > that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live > webcast > > and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding > territory! > > > http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid=110944&bid=241720&dat=121642 > > _______________________________________________ > > Wicket-develop mailing list > > [email protected] > > > https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop > > > > ------------------------------------------------------- This SF.Net email is sponsored by xPML, a groundbreaking scripting language that extends applications into web and mobile media. Attend the live webcast and join the prime developer group breaking into this new coding territory! http://sel.as-us.falkag.net/sel?cmd=lnk&kid0944&bid$1720&dat1642 _______________________________________________ Wicket-develop mailing list [email protected] https://lists.sourceforge.net/lists/listinfo/wicket-develop
